Got me thinking that there should be an award for teams in D1 which make the top ten in the final standings without the use of training camps. It'd be like climbing Everest without the use of supplemental oxygen. With a posse of superior riders (or maybe just one or two), some teams might have already done the sans-training-camp thing.
I think that a ranking of 1A teams that do not use TC bonuses = an empty ranking.

Just nine? Wow, thanks for the tip. I'm thinking the same EP output would be considered safe for a FFFFF race, as well.
I'm thinking that a tour cyclist
must use all 12 EP in a so called "damage control tactic" in a FFFFF sprint race.
When there would be wind in CAT stage 4 FFFFM, the 9 EP tactic of a tour cyclist might be risky, and sometimes too risky.
Now there was no wind, and 9 EP most likely too much energy, because this is how stage 4 went ( size of front groups per section ) =
100 - 99 - 84 - 83 - 1As you can see, no breaks in the peleton, because I suspect that there were just a number of tired helpers who dropped in s3.
Always handy to analyse a race like this, with the size of front groups per section. It could be valuable information for a next time.
The 4th is still the best-ever tour finish in D1 for my team, so I should be
, and I am.
Congratulations with your best GC result ever.
Hopefully somewhere in the future a very prestigious GC podium place. Already good luck !
This top GC result of Queiros already (unofficially-)secured your season goal of not to relegate, when I look at your pretty strong team.