I see that WCS "appointed" a stage 11 winner in the CFF League.
But if you look at the race page of WCS, there is no stage 11 winner but only this word ; Neutralized.
And because in the real life Vuelta, there was also no stage 11 winner,
it is in my opinion unlogical to "declare" a stage 11 winner in the CFF League.
Of course, this is just my opinion, and also of course, this is a very, very, very, very, very unimportant issue.
If you have a different opinion how to "solve this issue", let me know here in this forum ( or by pm ).
I can imagine if someone has a opinion that goes something like this ;
# we play a game organised by WCS, and if it "appoints" a stage winner in the CFF League, it does count,
no matter if it is a bit unlogical, or a bit unjustified, or a bit strange.
Or ;
# because this "issue" is extreme unimportant, let's count the stage win,
also because in this specific case, it really does not matter if there is a stage winner or not, it is just a statistic, nothing more.
(
and not of influence in the battle for winning the season trophy of most stage wins ; there the top 3 is far ahead ánd very close ).
Or ;
# another opinion with maybe a creative "solution".
Every opinion is welcome and can be decisive if there will be a stage 11 winner in the CFF League or not.
Just my opinion should not be decisive, I think.
And very understandable if you think it is not worth it to give your opinion about this "issue", due to the extreme unimportance.
Probably so extreme unimportant, that it does not deserve this too long forum post of mine.
About the CFF League after stage 11 ;
There are some changes because a lot did count in this stage 11 ( except for stage winner & boni-seconds & points at finish line ).
Patrick Kok takes over the green jersey.
Aurora Australis takes over the mountain jersey, ánd moves up to a podiumplace( = 3rd ) in the GC.
A real CFF League update of me, after stage 12.
